<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Terje Runde &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terjer.org/tag/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terjer.org</link>
	<description>life is a bitch, then you die</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Saw IMDb-score analysis</title>
		<link>http://terjer.org/2009/saw-imdb-score-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://terjer.org/2009/saw-imdb-score-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terje</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terjer.org/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw V was recently released on DVD and Blu-Ray. As all follow-up movies, they tend to be wacker and wacker for every new successor. Saw has been just that; they started making Saw I, which actually was a great movie, but kind of &#8220;nothing-but-a-horror-movie&#8221;. They continued with Saw II (not so bad either), but when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Saw V" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1132626/">Saw V</a><em> </em>was recently released on DVD and Blu-Ray. As all follow-up movies, they tend to be wacker and wacker for every new successor. Saw has been just that; they started making Saw I, which actually was a great movie, but kind of &#8220;nothing-but-a-horror-movie&#8221;. They continued with Saw II (not so bad either), but when Saw III came it really got me tired. It&#8217;s just the same story, but with some new and <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">exciting</span> different tools to kill the victims with. I admit it; I gave up half way through the film.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Saw IMDb ratings" src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pyHBLblBmhyZE8hIKsl1NFw&amp;oid=1&amp;output=image" alt="" width="450" height="320" /></p>
<p>Unfortunately, Google doesn&#8217;t offer regression analysis on it&#8217;s <a title="Google Docs" href="http://docs.google.com/">Google Docs</a> service, but obviously you see the ratings are decreasing for every new movie. I&#8217;m not going to watch Saw V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terjer.org/2009/saw-imdb-score-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Way To Die</title>
		<link>http://terjer.org/2008/another-way-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://terjer.org/2008/another-way-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terje</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terjer.org/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming 22nd James Bond movie Quantum of Solace (awesome title, I must say) just got it&#8217;s title track unveiled. As a result of this, a massive group of fans have been criticizing the song, saying it&#8217;s not &#8220;Bond enough&#8221;. From my point of view I must say the track is great, maybe better than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upcoming 22nd James Bond movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830515/">Quantum of Solace</a> (awesome title, I must say) just got it&#8217;s title track <a href="http://www.thirdmanrecords.com/">unveiled</a>. As a result of this, a massive group of fans have been criticizing the song, saying it&#8217;s not &#8220;Bond enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>From my point of view I must say the track is great, maybe better than Casino Royale&#8217;s (which indeed is awesome, especially accompanied by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nfc9GLxlhEw">lovely art in the title sequence</a>). What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terjer.org/2008/another-way-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
